• 观看记录
    • 关注公众号观影不迷路

    电影 盲目的丈夫们
    防止网址更换,请点击链接收藏永久发布地址:https://7rai.pages.dev
    豆瓣高分

    盲目的丈夫们

    影片信息

    豆瓣高分
    • 片名:盲目的丈夫们
    • 状态:HD中字
    • 主演:萨姆·德·格拉斯/Francelia/Billington/埃里克·冯·施特罗海姆/Fay/Holderness/Richard/Cumming/
    • 导演:埃里克·冯·施特罗海姆/
    • 年份:1919
    • 地区:美国
    • 类型:剧情/爱情/
    • 时长:内详
    • 上映:1919-12-07
    • 语言:英语
    • 更新:2024-12-13 11:31
    • 简介:Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the original version  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel. (Koszarski)  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to speed up the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shotscountershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
    • 关注公众号观影不迷路

    • 扫一扫用手机访问

     立即播放  无尽①

    选择来源

    • 无尽①
    5.0
    网友评分
    • 很差
    • 较差
    • 还行
    • 推荐
    • 力荐
    8.0 1次评分
    5.0
    网友评分
    • 很差
    • 较差
    • 还行
    • 推荐
    • 力荐
    8.0 1次评分
    给影片打分 《盲目的丈夫们》
    • 很差
    • 较差
    • 还行
    • 推荐
    • 力荐
    我也要给影片打分

    扫一扫用手机访问

    首页 电影 剧情片 盲目的丈夫们

    播放列表

     当前资源来源无尽① - 无需安装任何插件
     倒序

    剧情简介

    Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the original version  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel. (Koszarski)  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to speed up the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shotscountershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

    为你推荐

     换一换
    • 正片
      8.0 A Journey in Spring/
    • 正片
      7.0 杜尼亚·艾多杜/埃辛·盖迪克奥卢/Mirza/Elöver/
    • 抢先版
      7.0 白雪公主真人版/白雪公主和七个小矮人/Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs/
    • 正片
      4.0 Untold: The Liver King/
    • 正片
      7.0 Lost/로스트/파란/
    • 正片
      5.0 Salvable/
    • 正片
      6.0 杰西·麦特卡尔菲/特里斯汀·梅斯/Micah/Giovanni/Anthony/Palermo/Leesa/Neidel/崔佛·艾因霍恩/迪伦·穆尼/Royce/Adkins/Tom/Bonello/Chris/Cleveland/Michael/J./DelMauro/Mike/Dusi/BreeAna/Miyuki/Eisel/Logan/Garretson/大卫·莱特曼/Eduard/Osipov/Brandon/Reed/Scott/Reed/埃里克·罗伯茨/Murray/SawChuck/
    • 正片
      7.0 杰西·麦特卡尔菲/特里斯汀·梅斯/Micah/Giovanni/Anthony/Palermo/Leesa/Neidel/崔佛·艾因霍恩/迪伦·穆尼/Royce/Adkins/Tom/Bonello/Chris/Cleveland/Michael/J./DelMauro/Mike/Dusi/BreeAna/Miyuki/Eisel/Logan/Garretson/大卫·莱特曼/Eduard/Osipov/Brandon/Reed/Scott/Reed/埃里克·罗伯茨/Murray/SawChuck/
    • 正片
      4.0 挚友/
    • 正片
      2.0 挚友/
    • 正片
      8.0 杜尼亚·艾多杜/埃辛·盖迪克奥卢/Mirza/Elöver/
    • 正片
      HD
      8.0 瑞秋·齐格勒///安德鲁·伯纳普///盖尔·加朵///安德鲁·巴特·费尔德曼///杰里米·斯威夫特///泰塔斯·伯吉斯///马丁·科勒巴///贾森·克拉维茨///乔治·萨拉萨尔///安迪·格罗特卢鲁申///帕特里克·佩奇///艾米莉亚·福彻///安苏·卡比亚///哈德利·弗雷泽///洛丽娜·安德里亚///乔治·阿普尔比///科林·迈克尔·卡迈克尔///塞缪尔·巴克斯特///吉米·约翰斯顿///杜乔娜·吉夫特///伊德里斯·卡尔博///贾伊·贝托特/
    • 豆瓣高分
      尝鲜版
      7.0 罪孽者/罪人们(港)/
    • 正片
      HD
      10.0 The Luckiest Man in America/
    • 正片
      10.0 刘林城/靳阳阳/
    • 正片
      HD
      9.0 崔维斯·费米尔/詹森·阿克斯/弗兰西丝·费舍/亚历克·鲍德温/布雷迪·诺恩/Todd Bryant/哈耶斯·哈格罗夫/马蒂·林赛/卢斯·雷恩斯/Sean Dillingham/Bryant Carroll/Jayde Martinez/Stephen R. Estler/Dave Halls/Douglas Stewart/
    • 正片
      5.0 宝宝刺客/纪录片/
    • 正片
      8.0 Sofía/Allepuz/Alejandro/Escamilla/帕斯·贝加/罗伯托·阿拉莫/Paz/de/Alarcón/Amada/Santos/Daniel/Navarro/Cindy/Fuentes/Jose/Luis/Navarro/Enara/Prieto/Ana/Morán/Margarita/Asquerino/Beatriz/Cotobal/Carolina/Montoya/
    • 第7集
    • 第1期
      10.0 深潜韩国:宋智孝的海女冒险/Deep/Dive/Korea:宋智孝的海女冒险/딥 다이브 코리아: 송지효의 해녀 모험‎/

    最新资讯

    更多

    评论

    共 0 条评论